{"id":263432,"date":"2019-03-11T07:26:29","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T07:26:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/?p=263432"},"modified":"2019-03-11T07:27:39","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T07:27:39","slug":"rafale-files-not-stolen-but-photocopied-says-ag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/rafale-files-not-stolen-but-photocopied-says-ag\/","title":{"rendered":"Rafale files not stolen, but photocopied, says AG"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Attorney-General KK Venugopal Friday claimed the Rafale documents were not stolen from the Defence Ministry and that what he meant in his submission before the Supreme Court was that petitioners in the application used \u201cphotocopies of the original\u201d papers, deemed secret by the government.<\/p>\n<p>Political row <\/p>\n<p>His comments in the apex court on Wednesday that Rafale fighter jet deal documents were stolen caused a political row, with Congress president Rahul Gandhi targeting the government over stealing of such sensitive papers and seeking a criminal investigation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am told that the Opposition has alleged what was argued (in the SC) was that files had been stolen from the Defence Ministry. This is wholly incorrect. The statement that files have been stolen is wholly incorrect,\u201d he told PTI, in an apparent damage-control exercise.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Attorney-General KK Venugopal Friday claimed the Rafale documents were not stolen from the Defence Ministry and that what he meant in his submission before the Supreme Court was that petitioners in the application used \u201cphotocopies of the original\u201d papers, deemed secret by the government. Political row His comments in the apex court on Wednesday that Rafale fighter jet deal documents were stolen caused a political row, with Congress president Rahul Gandhi targeting the government over stealing of such sensitive papers and seeking a criminal investigation. \u201cI am told that the Opposition has alleged what was argued (in the SC) was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[130],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263432","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-newspapers"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263432"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263432\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/infralive.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}